{"id":3484,"date":"2026-09-15T07:34:40","date_gmt":"2026-09-15T07:34:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/?p=3484"},"modified":"2026-09-15T07:39:35","modified_gmt":"2026-09-15T07:39:35","slug":"peer-review-process-steps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/","title":{"rendered":"Understanding the Peer Review Process: From Submission to Publication"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_85 ez-toc-wrap-center counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#What_Peer_Review_Actually_Does\" >What Peer Review Actually Does<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Peer_Review_Process_Steps_The_Full_Journey\" >Peer Review Process Steps: The Full Journey<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_1_Manuscript_Submission\" >Step 1: Manuscript Submission<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_2_Editorial_Office_Check\" >Step 2: Editorial Office Check<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_3_Desk_Review_by_the_Editor\" >Step 3: Desk Review by the Editor<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_4_Assignment_to_the_Journal_Editorial_Board\" >Step 4: Assignment to the Journal Editorial Board<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_5_Reviewer_Selection_and_Invitation\" >Step 5: Reviewer Selection and Invitation<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_6_The_Review_Itself\" >Step 6: The Review Itself<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_7_The_Editorial_Decision\" >Step 7: The Editorial Decision<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_8_Manuscript_Revision_and_Resubmission\" >Step 8: Manuscript Revision and Resubmission<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_9_Acceptance_Copyediting_and_Proofs\" >Step 9: Acceptance, Copyediting, and Proofs<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Step_10_Publication_DOI_and_Indexing\" >Step 10: Publication, DOI, and Indexing<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Single-Blind_vs_Double-Blind_Review_What_Is_the_Difference\" >Single-Blind vs Double-Blind Review: What Is the Difference?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Single-Blind_Review\" >Single-Blind Review<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Double-Blind_Review\" >Double-Blind Review<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Open_and_Transparent_Review\" >Open and Transparent Review<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#How_Long_Does_Peer_Review_Take\" >How Long Does Peer Review Take?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Why_Peer_Review_Now_Matters_More_to_Institutions\" >Why Peer Review Now Matters More to Institutions<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#What_Institutions_Should_Put_in_Place\" >What Institutions Should Put in Place<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Common_Reasons_Papers_Get_Rejected\" >Common Reasons Papers Get Rejected<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#A_Pre-Submission_Checklist\" >A Pre-Submission Checklist<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Building_Publishing_Skills_Early\" >Building Publishing Skills Early<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#Conclusion\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-24\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#FAQs\" >FAQs:<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-25\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#External_Resources\" >External Resources<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Every research paper you read in a good journal has passed through a quiet, unglamorous filter. That filter is peer review. For a first-time author, it can feel like a black box. You upload a file, wait for weeks, and then receive a decision you did not expect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It does not have to feel that way. The <strong>peer review process steps<\/strong> are logical and repeatable. Once you understand what happens at each stage, you can plan your timeline, write better cover letters, and respond to reviewers with confidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This guide walks through the full journey, from the day you click submit to the day your paper gets a DOI. It is written for research scholars, PG students, and faculty members in Indian colleges and universities who want a clear, practical picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_Peer_Review_Actually_Does\"><\/span>What Peer Review Actually Does<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"336\" src=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121726-e1789454925991-500x336.avif\" alt=\"Peer review process steps\" class=\"wp-image-3494\" style=\"width:600px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121726-e1789454925991-500x336.avif 500w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121726-e1789454925991-300x201.avif 300w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121726-e1789454925991.avif 769w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Peer review is an expert quality check. Independent specialists in your field read your manuscript and judge whether the work is sound, original, and clearly reported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They are not there to praise you. They are there to test your claims. A good reviewer asks three questions. Is the method appropriate? Do the results support the conclusions? Has this been said before?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This matters beyond your own career. Peer review is what separates a credible journal from a predatory one. It is also the reason accreditation bodies and funding agencies treat peer-reviewed output as evidence of real research capacity. If you are choosing where to publish, start by reading the journal&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/editorial\/editorial-guidelines\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">editorial guidelines<\/a> and its <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/editorial\/publication-ethics\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">publication ethics policy<\/a> before you look at anything else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Peer_Review_Process_Steps_The_Full_Journey\"><\/span>Peer Review Process Steps: The Full Journey<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"332\" src=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-124459-500x332.avif\" alt=\"Peer review process steps\" class=\"wp-image-3496\" style=\"width:600px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-124459-500x332.avif 500w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-124459-300x199.avif 300w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-124459-768x510.avif 768w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-124459.avif 776w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Different journals use different software, but the sequence is broadly the same everywhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_1_Manuscript_Submission\"><\/span>Step 1: Manuscript Submission<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You upload your manuscript, figures, tables, and author details through the journal&#8217;s portal. Most journals also ask for a cover letter and a declaration that the work is not under review elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Formatting matters more than authors expect. Wrong reference style, missing ethics statements, or an over-length abstract can cost you two weeks before a reviewer even sees the paper. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/mantech-publications-authors\/submission-guidelines\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">author submission guidelines<\/a> line by line, then <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/mantech-publications-authors\/submit-paper\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">submit your manuscript<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_2_Editorial_Office_Check\"><\/span>Step 2: Editorial Office Check<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The editorial office runs a technical screening. Staff check file completeness, author declarations, plagiarism similarity scores, and scope fit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Papers fail here for dull reasons. Missing author affiliations. No conflict-of-interest statement. A similarity index above the journal&#8217;s threshold. Nothing about your science is judged yet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_3_Desk_Review_by_the_Editor\"><\/span>Step 3: Desk Review by the Editor<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Next, a handling editor reads the paper properly for the first time. The question now is scope and significance. Does this belong in this journal, and is it strong enough to justify reviewer time?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A desk rejection at this stage is disappointing but useful. It arrives in days, not months, and it frees you to submit elsewhere quickly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_4_Assignment_to_the_Journal_Editorial_Board\"><\/span>Step 4: Assignment to the Journal Editorial Board<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If the paper clears desk review, it is assigned to a subject specialist. This is where the <strong>journal editorial board<\/strong> earns its keep.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An editorial board is a panel of academics and practitioners who cover the journal&#8217;s subject areas. The board member handling your paper decides who is qualified to review it, weighs the reviews once they arrive, and makes the final recommendation. A journal with a thin or anonymous board is a warning sign. You can see how a genuine board is structured on the <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/editorial\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mantech editorial board page<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_5_Reviewer_Selection_and_Invitation\"><\/span>Step 5: Reviewer Selection and Invitation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The editor now invites two or three reviewers. They look for people with matching expertise and no conflict of interest, which rules out co-authors, colleagues at the same institution, and recent collaborators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This step is often the slowest. Reviewers are unpaid and busy. Several may decline before two accept. Two to four weeks here is normal and is not a sign that anything is wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_6_The_Review_Itself\"><\/span>Step 6: The Review Itself<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Reviewers read the manuscript in detail and write a structured report. Most journals ask them to comment on originality, methodology, results, clarity, and references.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They then recommend one of four outcomes: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. Accept without changes is rare. Treat a major revision as good news, because it means the editor still sees a publishable paper underneath.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_7_The_Editorial_Decision\"><\/span>Step 7: The Editorial Decision<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The editor reads all reports together. Reviewers frequently disagree, and when they do, the editor may bring in a third reviewer or use their own judgement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You receive a decision letter with the anonymised reviewer comments attached. Read it twice. The first read is emotional. The second read is where the actual instructions become visible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_8_Manuscript_Revision_and_Resubmission\"><\/span>Step 8: Manuscript Revision and Resubmission<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <strong>manuscript revision<\/strong> stage is where most papers are won or lost. You resubmit two things: the revised paper and a point-by-point response letter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The response letter is the document editors actually read closely. Quote each comment, state exactly what you changed, and give the page and line number. Where you disagree, say so politely and explain why, with evidence. Silence on a comment reads as evasion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Many Indian institutions now run internal support for exactly this stage, because a well-handled revision can turn a borderline paper into an accepted one. If your team needs structured help with writing and revision, look at <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/research-paper-assistance-services\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">research paper assistance services<\/a> or institution-level <a href=\"https:\/\/bgcglobal.in\/faculty-publication-guidance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">faculty publication guidance<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_9_Acceptance_Copyediting_and_Proofs\"><\/span>Step 9: Acceptance, Copyediting, and Proofs<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Once the editor is satisfied, you get an acceptance letter. The paper then moves to production for copyediting, typesetting, and reference checks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You will receive proofs to approve. This is your last chance to fix errors, and it is for corrections only, not new content. You will also sign a <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/mantech-publications-authors\/copyright-form\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">copyright transfer form<\/a> at this point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Step_10_Publication_DOI_and_Indexing\"><\/span>Step 10: Publication, DOI, and Indexing<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Your article is assigned to an issue, given a DOI, and pushed to indexing services. The DOI is the permanent link that makes your work citable and traceable for the rest of its life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Accurate metadata is what gets you discovered. Author names, affiliations, ORCID, keywords, and references all need to be correct at this stage. Journals that take this seriously offer proper <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/doi-and-metadata-services\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DOI and metadata services<\/a> rather than treating it as an afterthought.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote has-background is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"background-color:#f0bff3\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\"><strong> Ready to submit? <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-20959078 wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link has-text-align-center wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/editorial\/editorial-guidelines\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> Explore our transparent, rigorous peer review guidelines for authors<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Single-Blind_vs_Double-Blind_Review_What_Is_the_Difference\"><\/span>Single-Blind vs Double-Blind Review: What Is the Difference?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Journals differ in who knows whose identity. Understanding the <strong>single-blind vs double-blind<\/strong> distinction helps you set expectations and prepare your files correctly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"334\" src=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125054-500x334.avif\" alt=\"Peer review process steps\" class=\"wp-image-3498\" style=\"width:600px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125054-500x334.avif 500w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125054-300x200.avif 300w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125054-768x513.avif 768w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125054.avif 773w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Single-Blind_Review\"><\/span>Single-Blind Review<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Reviewers know who the authors are, but authors do not know who the reviewers are. This is still the most common model in science, engineering, and medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The advantage is context. A reviewer can check whether the authors have declared related prior work. The drawback is bias. Reputation, institution, gender, and country of origin can all colour a review, even unconsciously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Double-Blind_Review\"><\/span>Double-Blind Review<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Neither side knows the other&#8217;s identity. This model is common in management, social sciences, and humanities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It reduces bias against unknown authors and smaller institutions, which is why many early-career researchers in tier-2 and tier-3 colleges prefer it. It is not foolproof, though. Self-citations, distinctive methods, and dataset descriptions often reveal who wrote the paper anyway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you submit to a double-blind journal, you must prepare an anonymised manuscript. Strip author names from the file, remove identifying acknowledgements, clean the document properties, and refer to your own earlier work in the third person.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Open_and_Transparent_Review\"><\/span>Open and Transparent Review<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A growing number of journals publish the reviewer reports alongside the article, sometimes with reviewer names. This improves accountability and gives new researchers a rare chance to see what a real review looks like. Adoption in India is still limited but rising.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_Long_Does_Peer_Review_Take\"><\/span>How Long Does Peer Review Take?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"283\" src=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125348-500x283.avif\" alt=\"Peer review process steps\" class=\"wp-image-3499\" style=\"width:600px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125348-500x283.avif 500w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125348-300x170.avif 300w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125348-768x435.avif 768w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125348.avif 915w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Timelines vary widely by discipline and journal, but a realistic pattern looks like this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Technical screening takes a few days. Desk review takes one to two weeks. Reviewer invitation and review takes three to eight weeks. The editorial decision follows within a week or two of the last report. Your revision takes as long as you take. Production and publication add another two to six weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For most journals, submission to publication runs somewhere between two and six months. Anyone promising acceptance in 48 hours is not running peer review. They are selling a slot. If you are comparing options, the <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/peer-reviewed-journals\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">list of peer-reviewed journals<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/services\/paper-publication\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">paper publication process<\/a> pages are a good benchmark for what honest timelines look like.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_Peer_Review_Now_Matters_More_to_Institutions\"><\/span>Why Peer Review Now Matters More to Institutions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Something important changed for Indian higher education. The UGC discontinued the centralised UGC-CARE journal list in February 2025 and moved to suggestive parameters instead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The practical effect is that institutions can no longer outsource the judgement. Colleges and universities are now expected to form their own internal committees, assess journal quality themselves, evaluate editorial board credibility and peer review rigour, and issue clear guidance to their faculty and students.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That is a real administrative burden, and it lands on the IQAC. It also connects directly to accreditation. Research publications feed NAAC Criterion 3, NBA documentation, and NIRF research metrics. If your faculty publish in journals that cannot demonstrate a genuine review process, that evidence becomes hard to defend in front of a peer team.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_Institutions_Should_Put_in_Place\"><\/span>What Institutions Should Put in Place<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Start with a written journal selection policy that your departments actually follow. Add a verification checklist covering ISSN, editorial board transparency, indexing claims, and stated review model. Train your faculty so the policy is understood rather than filed. Then keep publication evidence organised throughout the year instead of scrambling before submission deadlines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Most colleges find the training piece hardest. Structured <a href=\"https:\/\/bgcglobal.in\/research-methodology-workshops\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">research methodology workshops<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/bgcglobal.in\/editorial-process-awareness\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">editorial process awareness sessions<\/a> help faculty understand publishing from the inside, which in turn improves the quality of what they submit. Broader <a href=\"https:\/\/bgcglobal.in\/research-support-services\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">research support services for institutions<\/a> cover documentation and profile management alongside it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote has-background is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"background-color:#d7e9ef\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong> Building a journal quality policy after the UGC-CARE change?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\">Get your research documentation audit-ready.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-20959078 wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/bgcglobal.in\/naac-accreditation-consultancy-services\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Talk to BGC about NAAC accreditation consultancy<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Common_Reasons_Papers_Get_Rejected\"><\/span>Common Reasons Papers Get Rejected<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rejection is normal. Most rejections trace back to a short list of avoidable problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Scope mismatch is the most common. The paper is fine, but it belongs in a different journal. Weak methodology comes next, usually small samples, no control, or missing statistical justification. Then come incremental findings that add little to existing literature, poor English that obscures otherwise good work, sloppy referencing, and undeclared ethics approvals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Three of those six are fixable before you submit. Check scope against the journal&#8217;s aims. Get a colleague outside your immediate group to read the paper. Verify every reference resolves. Authors who do this consistently see fewer desk rejections, and the <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/mantech-publications-authors\/benefits-for-author\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">author benefits and support<\/a> offered by serious publishers exist largely to catch these issues early.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Pre-Submission_Checklist\"><\/span>A Pre-Submission Checklist<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"334\" src=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125642-500x334.avif\" alt=\"Peer review process steps\" class=\"wp-image-3501\" style=\"width:600px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125642-500x334.avif 500w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125642-300x200.avif 300w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125642-768x513.avif 768w, https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-125642.avif 774w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Run through this before you upload anything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Confirm the journal&#8217;s scope genuinely matches your topic. Format references in the required style. Check the similarity index yourself. Confirm all co-authors have approved the final version and agreed the author order. Include ethics approval and funding statements. Anonymise the file if the journal is double-blind. Write a cover letter that states your contribution in three sentences. Keep a clean copy of the submitted version for your records.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Eight items. Twenty minutes. It saves weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Building_Publishing_Skills_Early\"><\/span>Building Publishing Skills Early<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Peer review is a skill students should meet before their doctorate, not during it. Postgraduate and doctoral programmes increasingly require a published paper for award, and students who understand review culture early publish faster.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you are still choosing a research pathway, compare <a href=\"https:\/\/bhavyagyan.in\/ph-d-programs-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PhD programs in India<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/bhavyagyan.in\/doctoral-engineering-courses\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">doctoral engineering courses<\/a> to see which programmes carry publication requirements and what they expect from you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote has-background is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"background-color:#ea9595\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\"> Faculty and scholars who want end-to-end support, from drafting to DOI, can review our paper publication services and check turnaround before committing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-20959078 wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/services\/paper-publication\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> review our paper publication services<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Peer review is not a hurdle placed in front of your work. It is the process that makes your work worth citing. Once you can name each stage, from technical screening through editorial decision to DOI assignment, the waiting becomes manageable and the feedback becomes usable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Submit to journals that publish their review model openly. Revise thoroughly rather than quickly. And if you are responsible for research quality at an institution, put a journal selection policy in place now that the central list no longer exists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote has-background is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"background-color:#ceb6b6\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\"><strong> Publishing a departmental volume or conference output this year?<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/mantechpublications.com\/services\/conference-proceedings\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Explore conference proceedings publishing<\/a>, or <a href=\"https:\/\/bgcglobal.in\/contact-form\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">request an institutional consultation with BGC<\/a> to align your research documentation with accreditation requirements.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"FAQs\"><\/span>FAQs:<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"schema-faq wp-block-yoast-faq-block\"><div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453169324\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q1. How many reviewers assess one paper?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Most journals use two or three independent reviewers, with a third added only when the first two disagree.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453205220\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q2. Is major revision closer to acceptance or rejection?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Closer to acceptance. It signals the editor sees a publishable paper that needs substantial work first.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453223677\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q3. Can I suggest my own reviewers?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Many journals allow suggestions, but editors verify independence and are free to ignore your list entirely.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453253445\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q4. What is the difference between single-blind and double-blind review?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">In single-blind, reviewers know the authors. In double-blind, both sides stay anonymous to reduce bias.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453273699\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q5. How long should manuscript revision take?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Journals typically allow 30 to 60 days for major revisions and 14 days for minor ones.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453305635\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q6. Does peer review detect plagiarism?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Software screening catches most of it. Reviewers sometimes spot undisclosed overlap that software misses.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453339003\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q7. Can I withdraw my paper during review?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Yes, but withdraw formally and before acceptance. Late withdrawals damage your standing with that journal.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453364898\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q8. What does the journal editorial board actually do?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">The board sets scope, selects reviewers, weighs conflicting reports, and takes final responsibility for decisions.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453381906\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q9. Is a paid publication charge a sign of a predatory journal?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">No. Many legitimate open-access journals charge fees. The warning sign is guaranteed or instant acceptance.<\/p> <\/div> <div class=\"schema-faq-section\" id=\"faq-question-1789453405466\"><strong class=\"schema-faq-question\">Q10. Do peer-reviewed publications count for NAAC and NIRF?<\/strong> <p class=\"schema-faq-answer\">Yes. Both frameworks assess research output, and journal credibility affects how that evidence is scored.<\/p> <\/div> <\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"External_Resources\"><\/span>External Resources<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)<\/a> \u2014 global guidelines on ethical editorial and peer review practice.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.icmje.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ICMJE Recommendations<\/a> \u2014 authorship criteria and manuscript preparation standards.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ugc.gov.in\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">University Grants Commission (UGC)<\/a> \u2014 official notifications on journal quality parameters in India.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.crossref.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Crossref<\/a> \u2014 how DOIs and scholarly metadata registration work.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doaj.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)<\/a> \u2014 a vetted index for checking open-access journal credibility.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wame.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)<\/a> \u2014 resources on identifying predatory journals.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/orcid.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ORCID<\/a> \u2014 persistent researcher identifiers used across submission systems.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Every research paper you read in a good journal has passed through a quiet, unglamorous filter. That filter is peer review. For a first-time author, it can feel like a black box. You upload a file, wait for weeks, and then receive a decision you did not expect. It does not have to feel that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3493,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3948,3912,3951,3250,3952,3950,3953,3954,3284,3949,3955],"class_list":["post-3484","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-education-career","tag-academic-publishing-india","tag-doi","tag-journal-editorial-board","tag-journal-selection","tag-manuscript-revision","tag-manuscript-submission","tag-peer-review-process-steps","tag-publication-ethics","tag-research-paper-publication","tag-single-blind-vs-double-blind","tag-ugc-care-discontinued"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Peer Review Process Steps: From Submission to Publication (2026 Guide)<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Understand every peer review process step \u2014 submission, editorial board review, manuscript revision, single-blind vs double-blind, and final publication with DOI.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Peer Review Process Steps: From Submission to Publication (2026 Guide)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Understand every peer review process step \u2014 submission, editorial board review, manuscript revision, single-blind vs double-blind, and final publication with DOI.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mantech Publications\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/mantechpublications\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-15T07:34:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-15T07:39:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"776\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"518\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aditya Saxena\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aditya Saxena\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aditya Saxena\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/09b18855d6b8729c8db8ff0b90360c3c\"},\"headline\":\"Understanding the Peer Review Process: From Submission to Publication\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-15T07:34:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-15T07:39:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2395,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif\",\"keywords\":[\"academic publishing India\",\"DOI\",\"journal editorial board\",\"journal selection\",\"manuscript revision\",\"manuscript submission\",\"peer review process steps\",\"publication ethics\",\"research paper publication\",\"single-blind vs double-blind\",\"UGC CARE discontinued\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Education &amp; Career\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"FAQPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/\",\"name\":\"Peer Review Process Steps: From Submission to Publication (2026 Guide)\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-15T07:34:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-15T07:39:35+00:00\",\"description\":\"Understand every peer review process step \u2014 submission, editorial board review, manuscript revision, single-blind vs double-blind, and final publication with DOI.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"mainEntity\":[{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453169324\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453205220\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453223677\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453253445\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453273699\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453305635\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453339003\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453364898\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453381906\"},{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453405466\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif\",\"width\":776,\"height\":518,\"caption\":\"Understanding the Peer Review Process: From Submission to Publication\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Understanding the Peer Review Process: From Submission to Publication\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Mantech Publications\",\"description\":\"Empowering Research &amp; Knowledge\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Mantech Publications pvt ltd\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/mantech_Publications_logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/mantech_Publications_logo.jpg\",\"width\":200,\"height\":100,\"caption\":\"Mantech Publications pvt ltd\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/mantechpublications\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/09b18855d6b8729c8db8ff0b90360c3c\",\"name\":\"Aditya Saxena\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c6ec5859179c60389a3adb34b37dd771b0af15b481906744bf3868b00ec8cca8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c6ec5859179c60389a3adb34b37dd771b0af15b481906744bf3868b00ec8cca8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c6ec5859179c60389a3adb34b37dd771b0af15b481906744bf3868b00ec8cca8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Aditya Saxena\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/bharat\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453169324\",\"position\":1,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453169324\",\"name\":\"Q1. How many reviewers assess one paper?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Most journals use two or three independent reviewers, with a third added only when the first two disagree.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453205220\",\"position\":2,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453205220\",\"name\":\"Q2. Is major revision closer to acceptance or rejection?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Closer to acceptance. It signals the editor sees a publishable paper that needs substantial work first.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453223677\",\"position\":3,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453223677\",\"name\":\"Q3. Can I suggest my own reviewers?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Many journals allow suggestions, but editors verify independence and are free to ignore your list entirely.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453253445\",\"position\":4,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453253445\",\"name\":\"Q4. What is the difference between single-blind and double-blind review?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"In single-blind, reviewers know the authors. In double-blind, both sides stay anonymous to reduce bias.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453273699\",\"position\":5,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453273699\",\"name\":\"Q5. How long should manuscript revision take?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Journals typically allow 30 to 60 days for major revisions and 14 days for minor ones.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453305635\",\"position\":6,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453305635\",\"name\":\"Q6. Does peer review detect plagiarism?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Software screening catches most of it. Reviewers sometimes spot undisclosed overlap that software misses.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453339003\",\"position\":7,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453339003\",\"name\":\"Q7. Can I withdraw my paper during review?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes, but withdraw formally and before acceptance. Late withdrawals damage your standing with that journal.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453364898\",\"position\":8,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453364898\",\"name\":\"Q8. What does the journal editorial board actually do?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"The board sets scope, selects reviewers, weighs conflicting reports, and takes final responsibility for decisions.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453381906\",\"position\":9,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453381906\",\"name\":\"Q9. Is a paid publication charge a sign of a predatory journal?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"No. Many legitimate open-access journals charge fees. The warning sign is guaranteed or instant acceptance.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453405466\",\"position\":10,\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.mantechpublications.com\\\/blog\\\/peer-review-process-steps\\\/#faq-question-1789453405466\",\"name\":\"Q10. Do peer-reviewed publications count for NAAC and NIRF?\",\"answerCount\":1,\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes. Both frameworks assess research output, and journal credibility affects how that evidence is scored.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Peer Review Process Steps: From Submission to Publication (2026 Guide)","description":"Understand every peer review process step \u2014 submission, editorial board review, manuscript revision, single-blind vs double-blind, and final publication with DOI.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Peer Review Process Steps: From Submission to Publication (2026 Guide)","og_description":"Understand every peer review process step \u2014 submission, editorial board review, manuscript revision, single-blind vs double-blind, and final publication with DOI.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/","og_site_name":"Mantech Publications","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/mantechpublications","article_published_time":"2026-09-15T07:34:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-15T07:39:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":776,"height":518,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Aditya Saxena","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aditya Saxena","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/"},"author":{"name":"Aditya Saxena","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/09b18855d6b8729c8db8ff0b90360c3c"},"headline":"Understanding the Peer Review Process: From Submission to Publication","datePublished":"2026-09-15T07:34:40+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-15T07:39:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/"},"wordCount":2395,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif","keywords":["academic publishing India","DOI","journal editorial board","journal selection","manuscript revision","manuscript submission","peer review process steps","publication ethics","research paper publication","single-blind vs double-blind","UGC CARE discontinued"],"articleSection":["Education &amp; Career"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":["WebPage","FAQPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/","name":"Peer Review Process Steps: From Submission to Publication (2026 Guide)","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif","datePublished":"2026-09-15T07:34:40+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-15T07:39:35+00:00","description":"Understand every peer review process step \u2014 submission, editorial board review, manuscript revision, single-blind vs double-blind, and final publication with DOI.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#breadcrumb"},"mainEntity":[{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453169324"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453205220"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453223677"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453253445"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453273699"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453305635"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453339003"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453364898"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453381906"},{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453405466"}],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Screenshot-2026-09-15-121447.avif","width":776,"height":518,"caption":"Understanding the Peer Review Process: From Submission to Publication"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Understanding the Peer Review Process: From Submission to Publication"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/","name":"Mantech Publications","description":"Empowering Research &amp; Knowledge","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Mantech Publications pvt ltd","url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/mantech_Publications_logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/mantech_Publications_logo.jpg","width":200,"height":100,"caption":"Mantech Publications pvt ltd"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/mantechpublications"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/09b18855d6b8729c8db8ff0b90360c3c","name":"Aditya Saxena","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c6ec5859179c60389a3adb34b37dd771b0af15b481906744bf3868b00ec8cca8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c6ec5859179c60389a3adb34b37dd771b0af15b481906744bf3868b00ec8cca8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c6ec5859179c60389a3adb34b37dd771b0af15b481906744bf3868b00ec8cca8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Aditya Saxena"},"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/author\/bharat\/"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453169324","position":1,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453169324","name":"Q1. How many reviewers assess one paper?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Most journals use two or three independent reviewers, with a third added only when the first two disagree.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453205220","position":2,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453205220","name":"Q2. Is major revision closer to acceptance or rejection?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Closer to acceptance. It signals the editor sees a publishable paper that needs substantial work first.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453223677","position":3,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453223677","name":"Q3. Can I suggest my own reviewers?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Many journals allow suggestions, but editors verify independence and are free to ignore your list entirely.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453253445","position":4,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453253445","name":"Q4. What is the difference between single-blind and double-blind review?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"In single-blind, reviewers know the authors. In double-blind, both sides stay anonymous to reduce bias.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453273699","position":5,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453273699","name":"Q5. How long should manuscript revision take?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Journals typically allow 30 to 60 days for major revisions and 14 days for minor ones.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453305635","position":6,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453305635","name":"Q6. Does peer review detect plagiarism?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Software screening catches most of it. Reviewers sometimes spot undisclosed overlap that software misses.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453339003","position":7,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453339003","name":"Q7. Can I withdraw my paper during review?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes, but withdraw formally and before acceptance. Late withdrawals damage your standing with that journal.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453364898","position":8,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453364898","name":"Q8. What does the journal editorial board actually do?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The board sets scope, selects reviewers, weighs conflicting reports, and takes final responsibility for decisions.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453381906","position":9,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453381906","name":"Q9. Is a paid publication charge a sign of a predatory journal?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No. Many legitimate open-access journals charge fees. The warning sign is guaranteed or instant acceptance.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Question","@id":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453405466","position":10,"url":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/peer-review-process-steps\/#faq-question-1789453405466","name":"Q10. Do peer-reviewed publications count for NAAC and NIRF?","answerCount":1,"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes. Both frameworks assess research output, and journal credibility affects how that evidence is scored.","inLanguage":"en-US"},"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3484"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3484\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3504,"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3484\/revisions\/3504"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3493"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3484"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mantechpublications.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}